This site is being now pushed to being the Noahs ark.  But the evidence shows that it defiantly cannot be the actual ark.  The formation shows it actually to be all wrong to be the actual ark.  It is the wrong size, wrong shape , wrong wood, wrong location.  Given what they claim to have found they themselves has proven it not to be the ark. But yet they still persist in their ideas. They claimed to have found both regular wood and petrified wood. Both types of wood would prover it not to be the ark.. The finding of petrified wood would show that the site is more than likely pre-flood not post flood.  Given the information of the countryside in the area of Turkey of the goddesses worshipping and pagan idol worship, it is entirely possible that the Durupinar site is actually related to paganism and demonic religious practices. Given the amount of the burring of the structure might indicate that the flood actually buried it. Given that Gobeklie Tepe was also built before the flood and was buried during the flood.  It dates around  6,000 years ago while the flood dates to around 5,000. If they find core samples around over 5,000 years, or any real petrified wood  then that would indicate also a pre flood structure. It is really doubtful that his structure is even a ship shaped structure what we are seeing is after many years of environmental and geological  changes.